Linang Xiao vs Qian Sun Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Oct at 03:10 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Xiao vs Q. Sun

CHN
1
Win
Played
2
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Xiao 1 - 2 Sun
They have played 8 sets in total, with Linang Xiao winning 3 and Qian Sun winning 5. The last match between Qian Sun and Linang Xiao was at the M25 Huzhou, 23-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Xiao | 1 |
| Sun | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Huzhou(10-23-25)
(Q3) M15 Monastir(09-26-22)
(Q2) M15 Monastir(09-05-22)
L. Xiao vs Q. Sun H2H Profile
L. Xiao vs Q. Sun Match Preview:
- How does Linang Xiao fare in their second serve compared to Qian Sun? Linang Xiao leads with 47.00% of points won, while Qian Sun registers at 39.80%.
- Regarding returning their opponents' second serves, Qian Sun has an edge, capturing 45.92% versus Linang Xiao's 41.81%.
- First serve returns show Qian Sun slightly ahead, winning 27.02% compared to Linang Xiao's 25.00%.
- Under pressure, Linang Xiao saves 54.70% of breakpoints, narrowly outperforming Qian Sun's 53.24%.
- In terms of overall match wins, Qian Sun displays a slightly better win rate of 54.55% over the past year, compared to Linang Xiao's 50.00%.
- Best surface performance is observed for Linang Xiao on Clay (62%), while Qian Sun excels on Hard courts (62%).
- Both players have mainly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K category, with Linang Xiao achieving a higher win rate of 58.97% compared to Qian Sun's 56.60%.
- How do the players rank in terms of opponent quality? Linang Xiao faces opponents with an average rank of 465.33, while Qian Sun's competition averages 310.49.
- In deciding sets, Linang Xiao has a better record (45%) than Qian Sun (33%).
- Event-specific performance should be considered important for current predictions, as some players thrive in particular events.
Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):
As we anticipate this upcoming tennis match, several critical factors can guide us to an informed prediction. Linang Xiao demonstrates proficiency in second serve performance and defending breakpoints, both vital in maintaining momentum during tight matches.
However, Qian Sun's ability to excel in returning serves provides them with an offensive advantage, potentially disrupting Linang Xiao's serve games effectively. Their superior historical performance on Hard courts also highlights a potential strength, depending on the surface for this match.
Though Linang Xiao contends with less challenging opponents historically, their slightly better success in deciding sets can offer them resilience in closely contested matches. Based on these competitive insights, Linang Xiao emerges as the more likely victor, particularly if the match requires nerves of steel and strategic serving.
Linang Xiao vs Qian Sun Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Xiao vs Q. Sun H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 40 | Games Won | 43 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:1:19 | Average Match Time | 1:1:19 |
| 65% (93/142) | 1st Serve % | 59% (66/111) |
| 62% (58/93) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (48/66) |
| 31% (15/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (14/45) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 32% (7/22) |
| 44% (49/111) | Return Points Win % | 49% (69/142) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (1/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Xiao Recent Matches Played
Q. Sun Recent Matches Played

L. Xiao vs Q. Sun Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.45% (117/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (82/82) |
| 55.36% (258/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.35% (190/180) |
| 53.18% (2289/2015) | Games Win/Loss | 50.92% (1764/1700) |
| 55.14% (102/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.52% (76/66) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/9) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 342 | Aces Total | 441 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 307 | Total Double Faults | 381 |
| 1:10:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 372.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 339.87 |
| 58% (5427/9420) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3321/5626) |
| 66% (3567/5427) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2259/3321) |
| 51% (2035/3993) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1008/2305) |
| 41% (411/1014) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (218/519) |
| 41% (3884/9567) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2159/5605) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 60.47% (104/68) | Futures W/L | 51.28% (80/76) |
| 55% (112/202) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (80/160) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (26/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (16/33) |
| 44% (22/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (16/42) |
| 88% (120/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (86/72) |
| 12% (120/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (86/14) |
| 9% (90/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (78/10) |